Objectives: To determine the length of time for the components of the emergency department (ED) turnaround time (TAT) study in 1998 and to ascertain physician satisfaction concerning laboratory services to the ED.
Methods: Using forms supplied by the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes program, participants conducted a self-directed study of ED TAT over a 4-week period. Data requested included various times of day associated with the ordering, specimen collection, laboratory receipt, and result-reporting stages of stat ED TATs for potassium and hemoglobin. Additionally, practice-related questions associated with the laboratory were asked. Participating laboratories also provided a physician satisfaction survey for up to 4 physicians who were users of ED services. Results of both the TAT study and the physician satisfaction survey were returned by mail. Participants were drawn from the 952 hospital laboratories enrolled in the 1998 College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study on ED TAT. The main outcome measures included the components of the ED TAT process, factors associated with decreases in ED TAT, and the results of the physician satisfaction survey.
Results: Six hundred ninety hospital laboratories (72.4% response rate) returned data on up to 18 230 hemoglobin and 18 259 potassium specimens. Half of these laboratories responded that 90% of potassium tests were ordered and reported in 69 minutes or less, whereas the TAT for 90% of hemoglobin results was 55 minutes or less. Comparison of the components of TAT for both potassium and hemoglobin with similar studies done in 1990 and 1993 showed no change. Factors found to statistically contribute to faster TATs for both tests were laboratory control of specimen handling and rapid transport time. When whole blood specimens were used for potassium determination, TAT improved. Emergency department physicians chose the study-defined lower satisfaction categories of Often, Sometimes, Rarely, and Never for the questions concerning the laboratory being sensitive to stat testing needs (39.1%) and meeting physician needs (47.6%). Many of the physicians surveyed believed that laboratory TAT caused delayed ED treatment more than 50% of the time (42.9%) and increased ED length of stay more than 50% of the time (61.4%) when compared with other specialty users of the ED.
Conclusions: Laboratory ED TATs have remained unchanged for almost a decade. Emergency department physicians are not satisfied with laboratory services. Although it appears that one issue may relate to the other, the interaction between the laboratory and the ED is quite complex and has been evolving for at least 30 years. Improvement in interoperability between the departments is essential for operational efficiency and patient care. Effective communication channels need to be established to achieve these goals.