RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Status of Medical Laboratory Science Faculty and Programs
JF American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
JO Clin Lab Sci
FD American Society of Chemistry and Laboratory Science
SP 3
OP 3
DO 10.29074/ascls.2020002428
VO 34
IS 1
A1 Freeman, Vicki
A1 Brown, Karen
A1 Parker Fenn, JoAnn
A1 Fong, Karen
A1 Genzen, Jonathan
A1 Goodyear, Nancy
A1 Lunz Houston, Mary
A1 Taff, Terry
A1 Tanabe, Patricia
YR 2021
UL http://hwmaint.clsjournal.ascls.org/content/34/1/3.abstract
AB A survey conducted on the status of medical laboratory science (MLS) education programs was conducted. Information on university and hospital program directors and faculty salaries, education level, certification, clinical and teaching experience, and responsibilities was collected. Additionally, the characteristics and operations of MLS programs in the university and hospital settings, including staff education requirements, open positions, certification patterns, program length, clinical sites, and teaching strategies, were obtained. A total of 160 respondents answered the university survey, and 119 respondents answered the hospital survey. The results summarize the characteristics of educational programs and Individuals who work in hospital and university settings as well as issues related to demographics, education level, rank, certification, experience, responsibilities, and salaries. Overall, university programs’ education requirements were higher (a minimum of a master’s degree) for MLS faculty, and the faculty were more likely to have doctoral degrees or postdoctoral training. In general, university programs had more faculty than hospital programs, and the university faculty and program directors also had higher median salaries. The top 3 areas in which university program directors had difficulty securing clinical sites were microbiology, blood bank, and molecular diagnostics. The top challenges to obtaining clinical sites included staffing, competition with other MLS/medical laboratory technology (MLT) programs, and increase in workload and time. Some programs used simulated labs when a clinical rotation site was unavailable. Generalizations on the survey results are limited because of the varying number of respondents to the survey questions, large standard deviations, and wide ranges. The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) board of certification is in the process of updating and redesigning the MLS survey of programs and faculty to facilitate responses and plan on implementing the survey in 2020. In addition, a survey on the status of MLT programs and faculty is in development. Both the MLS and MLT surveys of programs and faculty will be administered on a biannual basis, similar to the ASCP wage and vacancy surveys, so that data can be collected and analyzed longitudinally.