This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
- Ruth A. Bush, PhD⇑
- Teresa Mueller, CLS
- Beverly Sumwalt, CLDir
- Susan A. Cox, MS
- Mary L. Hilfiker, MD, PhD
- Address for Correspondence: Ruth A. Bush, Research Department (MC 5074), Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, 3020 Children's Way, San Diego, CA 92123, 858.966.4946, rbush{at}rchsd.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the quality of trauma specimens by comparing line draws to venipuncture.
DESIGN: The draw type (line or venipuncture); container type (Vacutainer or Microtainer); and suitability for processing (processed/hemolyzed/clotted) of routinely collected trauma specimens was analyzed.
SETTING: The clinical laboratory of a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Hemolyzed trauma specimens were analyzed according to method of collection, collector, and type of container to identify issues resulting in unusable samples.
RESULTS: The data shows that for 13% of all draws, portions of the results were affected by hemolysis. Sixteen percent of line draws and 6% of venipunctures were hemolyzed (p = 0.04). There was no statistical association with who collected the sample (p = 0.07) or type of container (p = 1.00).
CONCLUSION: Based on this sample of data, the laboratory recommends that, whenever possible, venipunctures be performed for laboratory testing of blood specimens to improve trauma specimen integrity.
ABBREVIATIONS: ED = Emergency Department; EMS = Emergency Medical Services; ID = identification; MLA = medical laboratory assistant; RBC = red blood cells; RN = registered nurse.
- © Copyright 2010 American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Inc. All rights reserved.