Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • Follow ASCLS on Twitter
  • Visit ASCLS on Facebook
  • Follow ASCLS on Instagram
  • RSS Feed
Research ArticleResearch and Reports

Innate Errors of Quantitative Streaking Methodologies

Jason Evans, Kyler Bankhead, Justin Dagostin and P. Rocco LaSala
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science July 2019, 32 (3) 107; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.2019001974
Jason Evans
West Virginia University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyler Bankhead
West Virginia University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin Dagostin
West Virginia University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Rocco LaSala
West Virginia University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

  1. Jason Evans
  2. Kyler Bankhead
  3. Justin Dagostin
  4. P. Rocco LaSala
  1. West Virginia University
  2. West Virginia University
  3. West Virginia University
  4. West Virginia University
  1. Address for Correspondence: Jason Evans
    , West Virginia University, jason.evans{at}hsc.wvu.edu

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to assess the variability of quantitative streaking between and within groups of laboratory professionals and students and an automated spiral plater. In today’s clinical laboratories, advances in technology present an everchanging landscape that mandates adaptations, and the microbiology laboratory is no exception. Despite these advancements, one of the most quintessential manual techniques employed by laboratory professionals and taught to clinical laboratory science and technician students is quantitative streaking of bacterial cultures. Although few, there are studies detailing the accuracy of a 0.001-ml calibrated loop, perhaps the most common tool for quantitative streaking; however, there has been a lack of work addressing the variability associated with laboratory personnel’s individual techniques and inherent variability. Our study analyzed the number of bacterial colony-forming units (CFUs) per milliliter that resulted from sequential plating by our control groups and automatic spiral plater from a common sample. The sample was a dilution of bacteria in saline from an initial 0.5 McFarland standard (approximation of 1.5 × 108 CFU/ml). Preliminary data indicate that in most instances, there were significant differences seen (via analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests; P < 0.05) within the test groups and considerable variations within each individual’s plating results (measured by coefficient of variation) for both the gram-positive and gram-negative organism dilutions tested, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, respectively. Although this result is not unexpected, our work also shows that there are manual streaking procedural changes that more closely mimic the results obtained by our automated plating, circumventing potential lab budgetary constraints with purchasing automated platers. Collectively, our data demonstrate that manual quantitative streaking protocols are an area of the clinical microbiology lab that should be regularly assessed for quality control to ensure accuracy and reproducibility between laboratory professionals.

ABBREVIATIONS:
  • CFU - colony-forming unit
  • Received September 5, 2019.
  • Accepted October 9, 2019.

American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science: 32 (3)
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
Vol. 32, Issue 3
1 Jul 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Innate Errors of Quantitative Streaking Methodologies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Innate Errors of Quantitative Streaking Methodologies
Jason Evans, Kyler Bankhead, Justin Dagostin, P. Rocco LaSala
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jul 2019, 32 (3) 107; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.2019001974

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Innate Errors of Quantitative Streaking Methodologies
Jason Evans, Kyler Bankhead, Justin Dagostin, P. Rocco LaSala
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jul 2019, 32 (3) 107; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.2019001974
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Barriers to Implementation of Quality Management Systems in Laboratories: Lessons from the Southern Africa TB Health Systems Project
  • Polyagglutination: Lectin Isolation for T-Activated Red Cells
  • Strength of Direct Antiglobulin Test as an Indicator of Disease Severity in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Show more Research and Reports

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • CFU - colony-forming unit

© 2025 The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Powered by HighWire