Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • Follow ASCLS on Twitter
  • Visit ASCLS on Facebook
  • Follow ASCLS on Instagram
  • RSS Feed
Research ArticleResearch and Reports

Comparison of Two Platelet Count Estimation Methodologies for Peripheral Blood Smears

Mary Malok, E Haywood Titchener, Carol Bridgers, Bo Young Lee and Richard Bamberg
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science July 2007, 20 (3) 154-160; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.20.3.154
Mary Malok
is medical technologist, Rex Hospital, Raleigh NC
BS MT(ASCP)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.malok@earthlink.net
E Haywood Titchener
is medical technologist, Clinical Pathology/Laboratory, Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Greenville NC
BS MT(ASCP)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol Bridgers
is medical technologist, Clinical Laboratory, Nash Health Care System, Inc./Nash General Hospital, Rocky Mount NC
BS MT(ASCP)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Young Lee
is temporarily not working in a clinical laboratory while caring for her young children
BS MT(ASCP)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Bamberg
is professor and chairperson, Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville NC
PhD MT(ASCP)SH CLDir(NCA) CHES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

  1. Mary Malok, BS MT(ASCP)⇑
    1. is medical technologist, Rex Hospital, Raleigh NC
  2. E Haywood Titchener, BS MT(ASCP)
    1. is medical technologist, Clinical Pathology/Laboratory, Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Greenville NC
  3. Carol Bridgers, BS MT(ASCP)
    1. is medical technologist, Clinical Laboratory, Nash Health Care System, Inc./Nash General Hospital, Rocky Mount NC
  4. Bo Young Lee, BS MT(ASCP)
    1. is temporarily not working in a clinical laboratory while caring for her young children
  5. Richard Bamberg, PhD MT(ASCP)SH CLDir(NCA) CHES
    1. is professor and chairperson, Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville NC
  1. Address for correspondence: Mary Malok BS MT(ASCP), 418 Meadow Drive, Fuquay-Varina NC 27526. (919) 557-6539. m.malok{at}earthlink.net.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two manual methods for estimating platelet counts from Wright's stained peripheral blood smears regarding their correlation with each other and with automated platelet counts. This correlation was examined in relation to whether the platelet count was high, low, or normal and in relation to whether the hemoglobin value was low versus normal or high.

DESIGN: Peripheral blood smears were Wright's stained and both platelet count estimation methodologies were performed on each slide. The traditional estimation method was the average number of platelets per oil immersion field (OIF) multiplied by 20,000 to yield a platelet count estimate per uL. The alternate estimation method was the average number of platelets per OIF multiplied by the patient's hemoglobin value in g/dL and then multiplied by 1,000 to yield a platelet count estimation per uL. The platelet count estimates were performed without the technologists having prior knowledge of the automated platelet counts which were produced on a Coulter LH750 analyzer. The agreement between the two manual methodologies with each other and each method with the automated count was assessed using the paired T-test and correlation coefficient analyses. These analyses were performed for the whole dataset as well as for subsets based on the automated platelet count and the hemoglobin value.

SETTING: East Carolina University's Clinical Laboratory Science program in collaboration with the Clinical Pathology/Laboratory at Pitt County Memorial Hospital (PCMH) in Greenville NC.

PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-four blood samples in EDTA-anticoagulant Vacutainer® tubes were used to conduct this study. Each blood sample had two peripheral blood smears made and stained on an automatic slide stainer. The blood samples were obtained from the Clinical Pathology/Laboratory of Pitt County Memorial Hospital in October and November of 2004. Each sample was given a unique numeric identifier with no personal identifying information from any sample being recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Platelet counts by two slide estimation methods and by an automated reference method.

RESULTS: The traditional platelet count estimation method had a mean for the sample of 269,000/uL, while the alternate estimation method had a mean of 155,000/uL. The mean for the automated platelet counts was 268,000/uL. The traditional estimation method showed no statistically significant difference in mean from the automated platelet counts based on the paired T-test (p = 0.87). The traditional estimation method counts and automated counts had a high Pearson Product Moment correlation coefficient of r = .90 and a minimally dispersed scatterplot, thus showing strong agreement. The alternate platelet count estimation method had a mean for the sample of 155,000/uL which, based on the paired T-test, was highly significantly different from the automated count mean (p < 0.0001) and the traditional estimation method mean (p < 0.0001). The alternate estimation method and automated counts had a lower r value of .81 and greater dispersion in the scatterplot. In comparing the estimation methods with each other and with the automated method, the differences and similarities in agreement observed for the whole dataset were also observed with each platelet count and hemoglobin subset of data.

CONCLUSIONS: Though the alternate platelet count estimation method has been recommended for use particularly with patients with low hemoglobin values, this study found that the traditional estimation method provided more agreement with automated counts than did the alternate estimation method for all samples as well as for the subset of samples with low hemoglobin values. For the present, the traditional method of estimating platelet counts from blood smears to evaluate automated results appears to provide adequate quality assurance.

ABBREVIATIONS: ANP = average number of platelets; ECU = East Carolina University; g/dL = grams per deciliter; PCMH = Pitt County Memorial Hospital; OIF = oil immersion field; uL = microliter.

    INDEX TERMS
  • peripheral blood smears
  • platelet counts
  • platelet estimates
  • © Copyright 2007 American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Inc. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science: 20 (3)
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
Vol. 20, Issue 3
Summer 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Two Platelet Count Estimation Methodologies for Peripheral Blood Smears
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Two Platelet Count Estimation Methodologies for Peripheral Blood Smears
Mary Malok, E Haywood Titchener, Carol Bridgers, Bo Young Lee, Richard Bamberg
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jul 2007, 20 (3) 154-160; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.20.3.154

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Comparison of Two Platelet Count Estimation Methodologies for Peripheral Blood Smears
Mary Malok, E Haywood Titchener, Carol Bridgers, Bo Young Lee, Richard Bamberg
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jul 2007, 20 (3) 154-160; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.20.3.154
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Barriers to Implementation of Quality Management Systems in Laboratories: Lessons from the Southern Africa TB Health Systems Project
  • Polyagglutination: Lectin Isolation for T-Activated Red Cells
  • Strength of Direct Antiglobulin Test as an Indicator of Disease Severity in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Show more Research and Reports

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • peripheral blood smears
  • Platelet counts
  • platelet estimates

© 2025 The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Powered by HighWire