Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • Follow ASCLS on Twitter
  • Visit ASCLS on Facebook
  • Follow ASCLS on Instagram
  • RSS Feed
Research ArticleResearch and Reports

Comparing ImmunoCard with Two EIA Assays for Clostridium difficile Toxins

Edward L Chan, Diane Seales and Hong Drum
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science April 2009, 22 (2) 81-85; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.22.2.81
Edward L Chan
Director, Clinical Microbiology, Professor of Pathology, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: echan@lsuhsc.edu
Diane Seales
Supervisor, Clinical Microbiology, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Trinity Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Drum
Pathology resident, Department of Pathology, Trinity Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

  1. Edward L Chan, PhD⇑
    1. Director, Clinical Microbiology, Professor of Pathology, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
  2. Diane Seales, BS
    1. Supervisor, Clinical Microbiology, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Trinity Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
  3. Hong Drum, MD
    1. Pathology resident, Department of Pathology, Trinity Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
  1. Address for Correspondence: Edward L Chan, PhD, D(ABMM), FCCM, Director, Clinical Microbiology, LSU Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130-3932, Phone: (318) 675-7834, echan{at}lsuhsc.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare three Clostridium difficile EIA kits for the detection of C. difficile toxins from clinical specimens.

DESIGN: A total of 287 fresh and stored stool specimens were tested using all three assays. Stools with discrepant results were sent to a reference laboratory for tissue cytotoxin assay.

SETTING: Trinity Medical Center, a community hospital with network hospitals

PATIENTS: Patients with diarrhea submitted stools for detection of C difficile toxins

RESULTS: Of the 287 stool specimens, 116 were positive and 171 negative for C. difficile toxins. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of Meridian EIA assay were 99.1, 97.7, 96.6, and 99.4%; ImmunoCard were 100, 98.2, 97.5, and 100%; BioStar OIA assay were 94, 98.8, 98.2, and 96% respectively. ImmunoCard provides the best sensitivity (100%) for C.difficile toxins A and B detection. The BioStar OIA rapid test missed seven positive stool specimens possibly due to failure to detect toxin B.

CONCLUSION: ImmunoCard has slightly higher predictive values, shorter turnaround time and greater convenience compared to the Meridian EIA Assay. ImmunoCard may be cost effective not only in smaller laboratories, but also in high volume laboratories, when used on a STAT basis or single request.

ABBREVIATIONS: C. difficile = Clostridium difficile, EIA = Enzyme Immuno Assay

    INDEX TERMS
  • C. difficile toxins
  • method comparison
  • © Copyright 2009 American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Inc. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science: 22 (2)
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
Vol. 22, Issue 2
Spring 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing ImmunoCard with Two EIA Assays for Clostridium difficile Toxins
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparing ImmunoCard with Two EIA Assays for Clostridium difficile Toxins
Edward L Chan, Diane Seales, Hong Drum
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Apr 2009, 22 (2) 81-85; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.22.2.81

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Comparing ImmunoCard with Two EIA Assays for Clostridium difficile Toxins
Edward L Chan, Diane Seales, Hong Drum
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Apr 2009, 22 (2) 81-85; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.22.2.81
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Barriers to Implementation of Quality Management Systems in Laboratories: Lessons from the Southern Africa TB Health Systems Project
  • Polyagglutination: Lectin Isolation for T-Activated Red Cells
  • Strength of Direct Antiglobulin Test as an Indicator of Disease Severity in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Show more Research and Reports

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • C. difficile toxins
  • method comparison

© 2025 The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Powered by HighWire