Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Students respond to patient Jenny Jones during the nursing SIM lab event
- Figure 2.
CLS students engage nursing students during Factor V Leiden real time analysis
- Figure 3.
Professional pride. Six-week post events attitudes of all attendees regarding IPE. Number of students with given response.
Tables
Survey #1 % pre-event (n = 66) Survey #2 % post-event (n = 66) Survey #3 % 6 weeks later (n=38) Clinical features Heat 66 94 89 Edema in the ankle or leg 88 95 100 Decrease in peripheral pulse 73 83 89 Tenderness 77 95 ND Risk factors Pregnancy 89 100 100 Post-partum period 55 89 95 Diabetes mellitus 67 64 84 Bedridden 89 97 ND Genetic Risk factors Factor V Leiden mutation 30 98 95 Protein C deficiency 18 60 68 Prothrombin 20210 mutation 44 73 71 Protein S deficiency 9 57 ND ND: not determined
Nursing staff contributes more to patient outcomes than laboratory staff Disagree (%) Neutral (%) Agree (%) CLS students pre-event (n = 29) 52% 41% 10% CLS students post-event 55% 41% 3% Nursing students pre-event (n = 37) 27% 30% 41% Nursing students post-event 51% 35% 14% The academic training for nurses is more rigorous than the training for CLS/MLS CLS students pre-event 76% 24% 3% CLS students post-event 69% 31% 0% Nursing students pre-event 24% 51% 22% Nursing students post-event 49% 35% 16% Laboratory testing for genetic mutations is easy to perform and interpret CLS students pre-event 33% 53% 13% CLS students post-event 55% 17% 28% Nursing students pre-event 62% 32% 0% Nursing students post-event 68% 19% 5%
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.