Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • Follow ASCLS on Twitter
  • Visit ASCLS on Facebook
  • Follow ASCLS on Instagram
  • RSS Feed
Research ArticleResearch and Reports

An Evaluation of the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network

W. Jon Windsor and Rodney E. Rohde
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science July 2019, 32 (3) 108-115; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.2019001834
W. Jon Windsor
Colorado School of Public Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodney E. Rohde
Texas State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The IHSN data flow from site location to the CDC, where the data is then inputted into FluView for public use. Additional information from laboratory-confirmed influenza cases provided to the CDC include patient ID number, surveillance site, hospital admission date, patient DOB, influenza test methodology, and identified influenza subtype (A or B).8

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    An example of a 2 × 2 table used to calculate sensitivity and PPV. Test 1 is the method of interest and Test 2 is the method used for reference. The sensitivity calculation is TP/(TP + FN). The PPV calculation is TP/(TP + FP). 25 Note: FN, false negative; FP, false positive; TN, true negative; TP, true positive.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Displays a list of the 10 EIP reporting sites and their varying requirements for influenza reporting. “Influenza reportable?” indicates whether influenza is required to be reported to the state department. “Reporting Window” indicates the state allowable timeframe for reporting before a penalty is incurred. And “Isolate sent?” indicates whether the laboratories that identified a positive case of influenza are required to send a specimen to the state health department for confirmation testing. 11-20

    EIP participating StateInfluenza reportable?Reporting WindowIsolatesent?
    Californiayes7 daysNo
    Coloradoyes4 daysNo
    Connecticutyes12 hoursNo
    Georgiayes (subtype A only)7 daysnot listed
    Marylandyes (subtype A only)immediatelyYes
    Minnesotayes24 hoursYes
    New Mexicoyes24 hoursNo
    New Yorkyes24 hoursnot listed
    OregonyesimmediatelyYes
    Tennesseeyes (subtype A only)immediatelyYes
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    A table comparing the turnaround times (test time), methodologies, analytical sensitivity, and positive predictive values (separated by influenza A and B subtypes) of 6 different randomly selected test methods selected from the CDC’s “Available FDA-Cleared Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests”22 and “FDA-cleared Nucleic Acid Detection Based Tests for Influenza Viruses”24 tables found on the CDC website. Sensitivity and positive predictive values for each test were calculated individually using package insert clinical study data of each methodology.26-31

        
    Sensitivity
    Positive Predictive Value
    Platform and/or InstrumentInfluenza Virus
    Types Detected

    Test Time

    Methodology

    A

    B

    A

    B
    GeneXpert XpressInfluenza A and Bapproximately 30 min or lessnucleic acid detection97.50%93.80%100.00%96.80%
    FilmArray®Film Array® TorchInfluenza A and B1-2 hrnucleic acid detection90.00%100%99.8%*100%
    ABI 7500 Fast DxInfluenza A and B4 hrnucleic acid detection100%100%100%100%
    Sofia 2 FIA AnalyzerInfluenza A and B10-15 minutesAntigen Detection97.00%90.00%74.60%84.20%
    BD Veritor ReaderInfluenza A and B10-15 minutesAntigen Detection83.60%81.30%93.60%93.30%
    Alere ReaderInfluenza A and B10-15 minutesAntigen Detection84.30%89.50%83.10%94.40%

    Note: hr, hour; min, minutes

    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science: 32 (3)
    American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
    Vol. 32, Issue 3
    1 Jul 2019
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    An Evaluation of the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    An Evaluation of the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network
    W. Jon Windsor, Rodney E. Rohde
    American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jul 2019, 32 (3) 108-115; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.2019001834

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    An Evaluation of the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network
    W. Jon Windsor, Rodney E. Rohde
    American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jul 2019, 32 (3) 108-115; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.2019001834
    Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • ABSTRACT
      • STAKEHOLDERS
      • SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
      • EVALUATION DESIGN
      • CREDIBLE EVIDENCE
      • SYSTEM ATTRIBUTES
      • CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
      • LESSONS LEARNED
      • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Barriers to Implementation of Quality Management Systems in Laboratories: Lessons from the Southern Africa TB Health Systems Project
    • Polyagglutination: Lectin Isolation for T-Activated Red Cells
    • Strength of Direct Antiglobulin Test as an Indicator of Disease Severity in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
    Show more Research and Reports

    Similar Articles

    Keywords

    • CDC - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    • DFA - direct fluorescent antibody
    • DOB - date of birth
    • EIP - Emerging Infections Program
    • FDA - Food and Drug Administration
    • FN - false negative
    • FP - false positive
    • ID - identification
    • IFA - indirect fluorescent antibody
    • IHSN - Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network
    • NCHS - National Center for Health Statistics
    • PPV - positive predictive value
    • RIDT - rapid influenza diagnostic test
    • RT-PCR - reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
    • TN - true negative
    • TP - true positive
    • WHO - World Health Organization
    • influenza
    • human
    • public health surveillance
    • evaluation studies as topic

    © 2025 The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

    Powered by HighWire