Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • Follow ASCLS on Twitter
  • Visit ASCLS on Facebook
  • Follow ASCLS on Instagram
  • RSS Feed
Research ArticleResearch and Reports

Predictors of Success on the MLT and MLS Board of Certification Exam

Janice Thomas and Jeffrey L. Alexander
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science October 2021, 34 (4) 46-51; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.2020002683
Janice Thomas
Weber State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey L. Alexander
A.T. Still University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Participant count by program and instruction mode N = 437.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Participant demographics by program and instruction mode (N = 437)

    Program
    MLT (n = 205)MLS (n = 232)
    Face to FaceOnlineFace to FaceOnline
    SexMale45234431
    Female449337120
    Race/ethnicityWhite/Caucasian709066115
    Black or African American0617
    Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander0101
    Asian35514
    Hispanic6656
    American Indian or Alaska native0201
    Unknown10647
    Age at graduationMedian23312534
    Minimum19212122
    Maximum44603958

    Participants graduated from 1 or both MLS programs, using either face-to-face or online delivery. AAS, Associate of Applied Science; BS, Bachelor of Science; MLS, medical laboratory sciences/scientist; MLT, medical laboratory technician.

      • View popup
      Table 2.

      Stepwise linear regression

      Unstandardized
      Coefficients
      Standardized
      Coefficient

      Program

      Step

      Predictor

      B

      SE

      Beta

      R2
      R2 change
      F

      p
      MLTn = 2051(Constant)127.142.240.24064.244<.001
      PA-GPA132.18016.491.490
      MLSn = 2321(Constant)196.298.098.09824.992<.001
      PA-GPA73.98616.893.276
      2.128.03016.753.006
      Sex34.28312.293.176

      Dependent variable = BOC score, measured as a continuous, scale variable. SE = standard error of B. 0 = female; 1 = male. PA-GPA = continuous scale variable from 0.0–4.0.

        • View popup
        Table 3.

        Pearson correlations between predictor variables and BOC scores


        Program

        Predictors
        Pearson CorrelationBOC Score
        MLT n = 205PA-GPA*Pearson correlation.490
        p.000
        Instruction modePearson correlation.308
        p.068
        Years to graduationPearson correlation−.172
        p.181
        Age at graduationPearson correlation−.131
        p.370
        SexPearson correlation.165
        p.086
        MLSn = 232PA-GPA*Pearson correlation.313
        p.000
        Instruction modePearson correlation.181
        p.362
        Years to graduationPearson correlation−.010
        p.914
        Age at graduationPearson correlation−.138
        p.202
        Sex*Pearson correlation.234
        p.006

        *Correlation with BOC score is significant at the (p < .05) (2-tailed).

        PreviousNext
        Back to top

        In this issue

        American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science: 34 (4)
        American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
        Vol. 34, Issue 4
        1 Oct 2021
        • Table of Contents
        • Index by author
        Print
        Download PDF
        Article Alerts
        Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
        Email Article

        Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.

        NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

        Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
        Predictors of Success on the MLT and MLS Board of Certification Exam
        (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
        (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science web site.
        CAPTCHA
        This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
        Citation Tools
        Predictors of Success on the MLT and MLS Board of Certification Exam
        Janice Thomas, Jeffrey L. Alexander
        American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Oct 2021, 34 (4) 46-51; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.2020002683

        Citation Manager Formats

        • BibTeX
        • Bookends
        • EasyBib
        • EndNote (tagged)
        • EndNote 8 (xml)
        • Medlars
        • Mendeley
        • Papers
        • RefWorks Tagged
        • Ref Manager
        • RIS
        • Zotero
        Request Permissions
        Share
        Predictors of Success on the MLT and MLS Board of Certification Exam
        Janice Thomas, Jeffrey L. Alexander
        American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Oct 2021, 34 (4) 46-51; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.2020002683
        Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
        • Tweet Widget
        • Facebook Like
        • Google Plus One

        Jump to section

        • Article
          • ABSTRACT
          • INTRODUCTION
          • MATERIALS AND METHODS
          • RESULTS
          • DISCUSSION
          • STUDY LIMITATIONS
          • CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
          • References
        • Figures & Data
        • Info & Metrics
        • PDF

        Related Articles

        • No related articles found.
        • Google Scholar

        Cited By...

        • No citing articles found.
        • Google Scholar

        More in this TOC Section

        • Barriers to Implementation of Quality Management Systems in Laboratories: Lessons from the Southern Africa TB Health Systems Project
        • Polyagglutination: Lectin Isolation for T-Activated Red Cells
        • Strength of Direct Antiglobulin Test as an Indicator of Disease Severity in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
        Show more Research and Reports

        Similar Articles

        Keywords

        • ASCP - American Society for Clinical Pathology
        • BOC - Board of Certification
        • MLS - medical laboratory sciences/scientist
        • MLT - medical laboratory technician
        • NAACLS - National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Science
        • PA-GPA - preadmission grade point average
        • clinical laboratory sciences
        • medical laboratory sciences
        • Education
        • certification

        © 2025 The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

        Powered by HighWire