Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • Follow ASCLS on Twitter
  • Visit ASCLS on Facebook
  • Follow ASCLS on Instagram
  • RSS Feed
EditorialDialogue and Discussion

Assessing the Practice of Laboratory Medicine

Isaac D Montoya
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science April 2004, 17 (2) 66-67; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.17.2.66
Isaac D Montoya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

  1. Isaac D Montoya

Extract

The healthcare continuum has been depicted in a number of ways in an effort to understand and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare. Numerous continuum models have evolved over the years including the use of service levels: e.g., prevention, acute care, long-term care; academic levels, e.g., health science center, community hospital, clinic; and provider levels, e.g., physician, CLS, nursing, pharmacy, just to name a few. The provider model is of particular interest to those in the CLS profession. The primary manner in which this continuum is modeled is to organize providers by the focus of their work, e.g., macro, micro. Aday and colleagues have developed a research continuum model that is divided into five blocks.1 These five blocks may be described as:

  1. Basic disciplinary research that focuses on theory development;

  2. Biomedical research that focuses on organisms;

  3. Clinical research that focuses on patients;

  4. Health services research that focuses on the system or institution; and

  5. Public health research that focuses on the community, e.g., environment, population.

A modification of this continuum model helps us understand how and where along this continuum some of the major healthcare disciplines have focused. Figure 1 illustrates where eight of the major healthcare disciplines occupy the continuum of care. There are some exceptions; however, this model reflects the most common of practices seen today.

As expected, physicians work along all aspects of the continuum. For example, physicians are involved in developing theory about disease states and treatment models as well as human…

  • © Copyright 2004 American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Inc. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science: 17 (2)
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
Vol. 17, Issue 2
Spring 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing the Practice of Laboratory Medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Assessing the Practice of Laboratory Medicine
Isaac D Montoya
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Apr 2004, 17 (2) 66-67; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.17.2.66

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Assessing the Practice of Laboratory Medicine
Isaac D Montoya
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Apr 2004, 17 (2) 66-67; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.17.2.66
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Dialogue and Discussion

  • Hail and Farewell
  • Response to Fall 2011 Article: Clinical Molecular Testing: Subspecialty, Entry-level or Specialist Certification
  • A Rose by Any Other Name is a … Dandelion?
Show more Dialogue and Discussion

Editorial

  • MBA Culture and the Value of Loyalty
  • “History is the present”
  • Transitions
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

© 2025 The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Powered by HighWire