Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • Follow ASCLS on Twitter
  • Visit ASCLS on Facebook
  • Follow ASCLS on Instagram
  • RSS Feed
Research ArticleFocus: Interpreting the Complete Blood Count

The Rationale for a Methodical Approach to Interpreting the Complete Blood Count and Its Development

Kathy Doig
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science July 2017, 30 (3) 171-172; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.30.3.171
Kathy Doig
Professor Emeritus, Biomedical Laboratory Diagnostics Program, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI
CMCM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: doig@msu.edu
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

  1. Kathy Doig, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM SH(ASCP)CM⇑
    1. Professor Emeritus, Biomedical Laboratory Diagnostics Program, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI
  1. Address for Correspondence: Kathy Doig, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM SH(ASCP)CM, 354 Farm Lane, Rm. N322, E. Lansing, MI 48824, 517-353-1985, doig{at}msu.edu
  1. Describe the value in using a methodical approach to interpretation of complete blood counts (CBC).

  2. Explain how a methodical approach to CBC interpretation for laboratorians differs from that used by physicians and other care providers.

Abstract

Using a consistent and methodical approach to interpreting results of a complete blood count can help ensure that reported results are accurate and no diagnostically significant results are overlooked. The approach presented in the Focus articles to follow was developed through observation of professionals and refined after use with hundreds of students. The approach is different than diagnostic algorithms used by care providers in that the steps aid in detection of spurious results that must be corrected before results can be reported by the laboratory.

ABBREVIATIONS: CBC - complete blood count

    INDEX TERMS
  • Complete blood count
  • CBC
  • algorithm
  • blood cell count
  • quality control

This edition of Focus emphasizes the development of a specific thinking skill: methodical interpretation of the complete blood count (CBC). In this context, “interpretation” will not mean using CBC results for diagnosis, though the following procedures contribute to that outcome. Rather, the emphasis will be on gleaning as much information as possible from the CBC results and ensuring that the results are reportable, after which, a diagnosis can be made. Ensuring that results are reportable is an important aspect that differentiates these procedures from most published diagnostic or management algorithms intended for care providers.

For each portion of the CBC (red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets), diagnostic and management algorithms can be found in the literature. They apply CBC results to differentiate patient conditions or to effectively apply treatments. Although diagnostic/management algorithms are valuable to laboratorians, they fall short of meeting laboratorians' specific needs in two respects. First, they make assumptions that the CBC data have been interpreted and translated properly into the terms used in the algorithm and second, that the patient results are accurate and reliable.

As an example of the first shortfall (proper interpretation and translation), the diagnostic algorithm may refer to “anemia,” while patient results are provided in terms of red blood cell counts, hemoglobin levels, and hematocrits. Laboratorians need to be able to translate those reported numerical values into the language of medicine in order to use diagnostic algorithms. Though most laboratorians learn to do this, the methodical approach in these articles will facilitate acquisition of that skill, particularly for laboratory students, and ensure that no diagnostic information provided in the results is overlooked.

The second shortfall of diagnostic/management algorithms is the underlying assumption that the patient results that are used in the algorithm are accurate and reliable. This is as it should be – care providers need to trust laboratory results. However, laboratorians must remain a bit circumspect about test results until all quality control and quality assurance methods have been applied. It is the incorporation of those aspects in these procedures that truly makes them specific to the needs of laboratorians.

The procedures presented in the following articles are founded in my observations of the approach to CBC interpretation used by other laboratorians but also by the physician hematologists and pathologists with whom I have worked. I once asked a colleague to come to a class and think out loud through a CBC so that students could “observe” the process. Another time, I was writing examination questions with physician hematologists in the medical school and they would mumble their interpretations as they pondered an unfamiliar CBC. The similarities in the manner in which the individuals approached the data were striking and I decided that my students needed to learn this overtly. I then applied an instructional approach, learned from Dr. Steve Yelon at Michigan State University,1 to make one's thinking processes visible to students. The result is essentially a procedure (so appropriate for laboratorians!) for interpreting the results of an extensive set of interrelated assays and calculations - the complete blood count. These procedural steps have been refined and revised extensively since I first began using them.

These articles make an assumption about the reader's background; that is, that the reader knows how the results of the measured parameters are generated for the CBC being interpreted. It is well beyond the scope of these monographs to explain the manner in which electrical impedance instruments count cells and contrast that with flow technologies, for example. However, it is critical that results be interpreted within the context of known interferences and with an understanding of the principles behind the assays. That added step cannot be fully addressed in these articles, but those instances where that understanding must be applied will be highlighted.

I wish to express appreciation to individuals who assisted, sometimes unknowingly, in the development of these procedures and articles. In addition to the colleagues who helped me “see” into their thinking processes, I must express appreciation to the many students whose stumbles revealed to me the weaknesses in the procedure that I taught them at that time. Thanks to physician colleagues who reinforced the value of this process when I taught it to medical students, sans the quality assurance portions. Appreciation is also due to Bernadette “Bunny” Rodak. As editor of her textbook, she accepted my proposal to add a version of these procedures to a chapter on peripheral blood film examination. Maybe it was not the best fit in that chapter, but I just wanted it to be some place in the book. Particular thanks then go to my co-author of that chapter, Lynn Maedel, who was one of those individuals whose thinking process inspired this and then who helped refine the procedures in print. More recently, my thanks go to Dr. Elaine Keohane, current editor of Rodak's Hematology, and to Elsevier Publishers for permission to share the content in this Focus series, while respecting their copyright concerns. And finally, thanks to my Focus co-authors whose examples bring the procedures to life and demonstrate why using these procedures can make a difference in the work laboratorians do.

  • © Copyright 2017 American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Inc. All rights reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Yelon SL
    . Powerful Principles of Instruction. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers USA; 1996.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science: 30 (3)
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
Vol. 30, Issue 3
Summer 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Rationale for a Methodical Approach to Interpreting the Complete Blood Count and Its Development
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Rationale for a Methodical Approach to Interpreting the Complete Blood Count and Its Development
Kathy Doig
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jul 2017, 30 (3) 171-172; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.30.3.171

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Rationale for a Methodical Approach to Interpreting the Complete Blood Count and Its Development
Kathy Doig
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jul 2017, 30 (3) 171-172; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.30.3.171
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Methodical Approach to Interpreting the White Blood Cell Parameters of the Complete Blood Count
  • A Methodical Approach to Interpreting the Red Blood Cell Parameters of the Complete Blood Count
Show more Focus: Interpreting the Complete Blood Count

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Complete blood count
  • CBC
  • algorithm
  • blood cell count
  • quality control

© 2025 The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Powered by HighWire