Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
  • ascls.org
    • ascls.org
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Informed Consent
    • Human and Animal Rights
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
  • Follow ASCLS on Twitter
  • Visit ASCLS on Facebook
  • Follow ASCLS on Instagram
  • RSS Feed
Research ArticleResearch and Reports

In Support of Quality and Safe Patient Care: Defining the Value of Laboratory Medicine

Paul L. Epner, Julie Gayken and Anthony Kurec
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science January 2019, 32 (1) 13-18; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.2018001370
Paul L. Epner
Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Gayken
Health Partners Medical Group and Clinics and Regions Hospital (retired)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Kurec
State University of New York Upstate Medical University (retired)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Responses regarding initiatives taken that best describe the laboratory’s value.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Responses to change

    QuestionsStrongly DisagreeDisagreeNeither Agree norDisagreeAgreeStrongly AgreeTotal % in Agreement
    The shift, FROM fee for service, eg, “clinical laboratory fee schedule” reimbursed TO bundled, capitated, or value-based reimbursement is commanding significant attention from our parent organization.184%277%13133%14235%8421%56.2%
    Significant change in our laboratory will occur as a direct result of this reimbursement change.184%297%13534%14636%7418%54.7%
    Our laboratory feels significant pressure to demonstrate our value to our institution’s senior leadership.184%4010%7619%14235%12631%66.7%
    Our laboratory feels significant pressure to cut costs.154%256%8521%13032%14737%68.9%

    Note: Agree + strongly agree = total percent in agreement.

      • View popup
      Table 2.

      Categories of current and completed quality improvement initiatives that demonstrate the value of laboratory medicine

      CategoryFrequency of Responses
      Appropriateness of laboratory testing (utilization focus)33%
      Infection prevention and therapy including antibiotic stewardship23%
      Operational/process improvement17%
      Emergent care: Diagnosis/treatment and operations15%
      Quality assurance systems9%
      Patient management and support3%

      Note: Based on 133 codable responses.

        • View popup
        Table 3.

        Examples of qualitative and quantitative measures that impact patient outcomes in determining the laboratory’s involvement and performance

        CategoryFrequency of Responses
        Operational and process measures31%
        Laboratory use and outcome measures20%
        Emergent care measures16%
        Infection prevention and therapy, including antibiotic stewardship measures15%
        Quality system measures11%
        Miscellaneous and patient/health care staff satisfaction survey measures7%

        Note: Question #10 (Appendix A) category and detail results–Highest to lowest frequency: 184 codable responses.

          • View popup
          Table 4.

          Wish list concepts that could support the value of the laboratory

          Category
          Appropriateness of test orders that is diagnosis- and treatment-driven
          Appropriateness of test orders as they relate to wellness and prevention
          Provide accurate, timely, and cost-effective test information
          Communication of laboratory results for coordination of care
          Laboratory result follow-up with interpretation and application
          Support patient involvement in their own care and well-being
          Patient safety and laboratory medicine

          Note: Based on 183 respondents providing multiple ideas.

          PreviousNext
          Back to top

          In this issue

          American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science: 32 (1)
          American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
          Vol. 32, Issue 1
          1 Jan 2019
          • Table of Contents
          • Index by author
          Print
          Download PDF
          Article Alerts
          Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
          Email Article

          Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.

          NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

          Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
          In Support of Quality and Safe Patient Care: Defining the Value of Laboratory Medicine
          (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science
          (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science web site.
          CAPTCHA
          This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
          Citation Tools
          In Support of Quality and Safe Patient Care: Defining the Value of Laboratory Medicine
          Paul L. Epner, Julie Gayken, Anthony Kurec
          American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jan 2019, 32 (1) 13-18; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.2018001370

          Citation Manager Formats

          • BibTeX
          • Bookends
          • EasyBib
          • EndNote (tagged)
          • EndNote 8 (xml)
          • Medlars
          • Mendeley
          • Papers
          • RefWorks Tagged
          • Ref Manager
          • RIS
          • Zotero
          Request Permissions
          Share
          In Support of Quality and Safe Patient Care: Defining the Value of Laboratory Medicine
          Paul L. Epner, Julie Gayken, Anthony Kurec
          American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Jan 2019, 32 (1) 13-18; DOI: 10.29074/ascls.2018001370
          Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
          • Tweet Widget
          • Facebook Like
          • Google Plus One

          Jump to section

          • Article
            • INTRODUCTION
            • METHODS AND MATERIALS
            • SURVEY RESULTS
            • DISCUSSION
            • CONCLUSIONS
            • REFERENCES
          • Figures & Data
          • Info & Metrics
          • PDF

          Related Articles

          • No related articles found.
          • Google Scholar

          Cited By...

          • No citing articles found.
          • Google Scholar

          More in this TOC Section

          • Barriers to Implementation of Quality Management Systems in Laboratories: Lessons from the Southern Africa TB Health Systems Project
          • Polyagglutination: Lectin Isolation for T-Activated Red Cells
          • Strength of Direct Antiglobulin Test as an Indicator of Disease Severity in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
          Show more Research and Reports

          Similar Articles

          Keywords

          • CCCLW - Coordinating Council on the Clinical Laboratory Workforce
          • TMTV - Taskforce to Measure Testing-Related Value

          © 2025 The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science

          Powered by HighWire